<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Efficient Online Index Construction for Text Databases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://papersincomputerscience.org/2009/04/27/efficient-online-index-construction-for-text-databases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://papersincomputerscience.org/2009/04/27/efficient-online-index-construction-for-text-databases/</link>
	<description>Discussion of computer science publications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Harrison</title>
		<link>http://papersincomputerscience.org/2009/04/27/efficient-online-index-construction-for-text-databases/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 01:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://papersincomputerscience.org/?p=129#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Ah. Figures I wouldn&#039;t be the first person to invent this.

Note that this is applicable to any problem where you want to perform updates on a key value store, and the updates are associative (aka a semigroup). So you can do fast wordcount this way on massive documents. Or your updates might be updates to individual fields of a row of a table. Or your updates might add and remove items from a sorted list, allowing documents to be deleted from as well as inserted into an inverted index.

The nice thing is that you don&#039;t have to retrieve a key in order to update it. You defer the update to the most convenient time.

http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/blog/01244327900</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah. Figures I wouldn&#8217;t be the first person to invent this.</p>
<p>Note that this is applicable to any problem where you want to perform updates on a key value store, and the updates are associative (aka a semigroup). So you can do fast wordcount this way on massive documents. Or your updates might be updates to individual fields of a row of a table. Or your updates might add and remove items from a sorted list, allowing documents to be deleted from as well as inserted into an inverted index.</p>
<p>The nice thing is that you don&#8217;t have to retrieve a key in order to update it. You defer the update to the most convenient time.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/blog/01244327900" rel="nofollow">http://www.logarithmic.net/pfh/blog/01244327900</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

